<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SWFFix releases public alpha!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bunnyhero.org/2007/07/28/swffix-releases-public-alpha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bunnyhero.org/2007/07/28/swffix-releases-public-alpha/</link>
	<description>Notes on Flash and Web development</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bunnyhero</title>
		<link>http://www.bunnyhero.org/2007/07/28/swffix-releases-public-alpha/#comment-2934</link>
		<dc:creator>bunnyhero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bunnyhero.org/2007/07/28/swffix-releases-public-alpha/#comment-2934</guid>
		<description>Very interesting! I wonder if SWFFix would be penalized the same way, since it uses a very different approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting! I wonder if SWFFix would be penalized the same way, since it uses a very different approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.bunnyhero.org/2007/07/28/swffix-releases-public-alpha/#comment-2927</link>
		<dc:creator>sherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bunnyhero.org/2007/07/28/swffix-releases-public-alpha/#comment-2927</guid>
		<description>I attended a session with a Google engineer a couple weeks ago, where he characterized swfobject as a "dangerous" technique for optimizing Flash for search engines. He said that he could not guarantee that swfobject users would not be penalized, even if their implementation was totally above-board:

&lt;a href="http://www.searchmatters.net/2007/07/16/google-flash-fixes-can-be-%e2%80%9cdangerous%e2%80%9d/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google: Flash Fixes Can Be "Dangerous"&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended a session with a Google engineer a couple weeks ago, where he characterized swfobject as a &#8220;dangerous&#8221; technique for optimizing Flash for search engines. He said that he could not guarantee that swfobject users would not be penalized, even if their implementation was totally above-board:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.searchmatters.net/2007/07/16/google-flash-fixes-can-be-%e2%80%9cdangerous%e2%80%9d/" rel="nofollow">Google: Flash Fixes Can Be &#8220;Dangerous&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
